Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 10036, 2024 05 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38693432

ABSTRACT

Parkinson's disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder in which loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra results in a clinically heterogeneous group with variable motor and non-motor symptoms with a degree of misdiagnosis. Only 3-25% of sporadic Parkinson's patients present with genetic abnormalities that could represent a risk factor, thus environmental, metabolic, and other unknown causes contribute to the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease, which highlights the critical need for biomarkers. In the present study, we prospectively collected and analyzed plasma samples from 194 Parkinson's disease patients and 197 age-matched non-diseased controls. N-acetyl putrescine (NAP) in combination with sense of smell (B-SIT), depression/anxiety (HADS), and acting out dreams (RBD1Q) clinical measurements demonstrated combined diagnostic utility. NAP was increased by 28% in Parkinsons disease patients and exhibited an AUC of 0.72 as well as an OR of 4.79. The clinical and NAP panel demonstrated an area under the curve, AUC = 0.9 and an OR of 20.4. The assessed diagnostic panel demonstrates combinatorial utility in diagnosing Parkinson's disease, allowing for an integrated interpretation of disease pathophysiology and highlighting the use of multi-tiered panels in neurological disease diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers , Parkinson Disease , Putrescine , Humans , Parkinson Disease/diagnosis , Male , Biomarkers/blood , Female , Aged , Middle Aged , Putrescine/analogs & derivatives , Prospective Studies , Case-Control Studies
2.
Anal Biochem ; 645: 114604, 2022 05 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35217005

ABSTRACT

Low molecular-mass aliphatic carboxylic acids are critically important for intermediate metabolism and may serve as important biomarkers for metabolic homeostasis. Here in, we focused on multiplexed method development of aliphatic carboxylic analytes, including methylsuccinic acid (MSA), ethylmalonic acid (EMA), and glutaric acid (GA). Also assessed was their utility in a population's health as well as metabolic disease screening in both plasma and urine matrices. MSA, EMA, and GA are constitutional isomers of dicarboxylic acid with high polarity and poor ionization efficiency, resulting in such challenges as poor signal intensity and retention, particularly in reversed-phase liquid chromatography with electrospray mass spectrometry (RP-LC-ESI-MS/MS). Derivatization using n-butanol was performed in the sample preparation to enhance the signal intensity accompanied with a positive charge from ionization in complicated biomatrices as well as to improve the separation of these isomers with optimal retention. Fit-for-purpose method validation results demonstrated quantitative ranges for MSA/EMA/GA from 5/10/20 ng/mL to 400 ng/mL in plasma analysis, and 100/200/100 ng/mL to 5000/10000/5000 ng/mL in urine analysis. This validated method demonstrates future utility when exploring population health analysis and biomarker development in metabolic diseases.


Subject(s)
Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization , Tandem Mass Spectrometry , Chromatography, Liquid/methods , Glutarates , Malonates , Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization/methods , Succinates , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods
3.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 15052, 2021 07 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34302010

ABSTRACT

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for prostate cancer (PCa) is limited by the lack of specificity but is further complicated in the benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) population which also exhibit elevated PSA, representing a clear unmet need to distinguish BPH from PCa. Herein, we evaluated the utility of FLNA IP-MRM, age, and prostate volume to stratify men with BPH from those with PCa. Diagnostic performance of the biomarker panel was better than PSA alone in discriminating patients with negative biopsy from those with PCa, as well as those who have had multiple prior biopsies (AUC 0.75 and 0.87 compared to AUC of PSA alone 0.55 and 0.57 for patients who have had single compared to multiple negative biopsies, respectively). Of interest, in patients with PCa, the panel demonstrated improved performance than PSA alone in those with Gleason scores of 5-7 (AUC 0.76 vs. 0.56) and Gleason scores of 8-10 (AUC 0.74 vs. 0.47). With Gleason scores (8-10), the negative predictive value of the panel is 0.97, indicating potential to limit false negatives in aggressive cancers. Together, these data demonstrate the ability of the biomarker panel to perform better than PSA alone in men with BPH, thus preventing unnecessary biopsies.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Diagnosis, Differential , Prostatic Hyperplasia/diagnosis , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Aged , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Prostate/metabolism , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Hyperplasia/blood , Prostatic Hyperplasia/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology
4.
J Pharm Biomed Anal ; 197: 113981, 2021 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33657526

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule 1 (NCAM-1), a multifunctional member of the immunoglobulin superfamily, is expressed on the surface of neurons, glia, skeletal muscle, and natural killer cells. NCAM-1 has been implicated as having a role in cell-cell adhesion, involved in development of the nervous system, and for cells involved in the expansion of T cells and dendritic cells which play an important role in immune surveillance. Sensitive and specific methods to quantify non-surface bound NCAM-1 are not available. METHOD: A sandwich ligand binding assay was developed for quantification of NCAM-1 in plasma and validated using an electro-chemiluminescent (ECL) technology. RESULTS: The data presented here demonstrated that the validated method met all prespecified criteria for precision, linearity, and accuracy in the range of 62.5 ng/mL to 4000.0 ng/mL, the range believed to be most relevant for plasma. The bioanalytical validation of the assay established the inter-assay coefficient of variation <8 % for calibration points, <2 % for high quality control (HQC), <8 % for medium quality control (MQC) and <19 % for low quality control (LQC) samples. Purified NCAM-1 spike-recovery experiment in plasma was used to determine assay accuracy; nominal concentrations (%) of NCAM-1 ranged from 91 % to 112 % for high and low spike level, respectively. Assay performance was subsequently evaluated for parallelism, selectivity, interference, and stability. CONCLUSION: NCAM-1 assay has been developed and validated in human plasma and met all assay validation parameters pre-determined during development. Clinical testing of human plasma samples indicated that NCAM-1 does not seem to be influenced by age and was slightly influenced by gender. NCAM-1 assay has potential to be used as a biomarker assay once the assay is subjected to appropriate clinical assessment and diagnostic thresholds are established.


Subject(s)
Neural Cell Adhesion Molecules , Biomarkers , CD56 Antigen , Calibration , Humans , Immunoassay , Quality Control
5.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29682400

ABSTRACT

This study reports on the development of a novel serum protein panel of three prostate cancer biomarkers, Filamin A, Filamin B and Keratin-19 (FLNA, FLNB and KRT19) using multivariate models for disease screening and prognosis. ELISA and IPMRM (LC-MS/MS) based assays were developed and analytically validated by quantitative measurements of the biomarkers in serum. Retrospectively collected and clinically annotated serum samples with PSA values and Gleason scores were analyzed from subjects who underwent prostate biopsy, and showed no evidence of cancer with or without indication of prostatic hyperplasia, or had a definitive pathology diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Probit linear regression models were used to combine the analytes into score functions to address the following clinical questions: does the biomarker test augment PSA for population screening? Can aggressive disease be differentiated from lower risk disease, and can the panel discriminate between prostate cancer and benign prostate hyperplasia? Modelling of the data showed that the new prostate biomarkers and PSA in combination were better than PSA alone in identifying prostate cancer, improved the prediction of high and low risk disease, and improved prediction of cancer versus benign prostate hyperplasia.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...